The user wants to update opencode to the latest version, and specifically the one that runs this server (the current user's installation), not the one installed for root. Let me first figure out where opencode is installed for this user and what version is currently running.
`opencode` is not in the PATH. Let me check if this server was started by opencode, and look for opencode installations in common locations like the user's home directory or npx cache.
The user is running as root (`HOME=/root`, `USER=root`). opencode is not installed via npm globally or via npx. Let me check if it's running from a different directory or if there's a local installation. Let me also check the environment variables and the opencode.json config. Wait - the user says "update the one that runs this server and not the one installed for root". But we ARE running as root (USER=root). So maybe the user means there's a different user's opencode installation? Let me check other users. Actually, re-reading: "make sure you update the one that runs this server and not the one installed for root". The current user IS root. So maybe the "server" is running as a non-root user? Let me check for other users.
So opencode is running as root, installed at `/root/.opencode/bin/opencode`. There's only the root user on this system. The user's instruction says "update the one that runs this server and not the one installed for root" - but the server IS running as root. This is a contradiction. Wait, maybe the user means: - "the one that runs this server" = the opencode that's currently running (which happens to be in /root/.opencode) - "not the one installed for root" = maybe there's a system-wide installation? But looking at the ps output, the running process is `/root/.opencode/bin/opencode`. And the only user with a home directory is root. Let me just clarify with the user, or proceed to update the opencode at `/root/.opencode/bin/opencode` since that's the one running the server. Actually, re-reading once more: "update the one that runs this server and not the one installed for root". Maybe the user means: don't use `npm install -g opencode` (which would install for root globally), but instead update the local installation at `/root/.opencode/`. Since the running instance is at `/root/.opencode/bin/opencode`, I should update that one. The typical way to update opencode when installed via npm is `npm update -g @opencode/opencode` or similar. But let me check the installation method. Let me check what's in /root/.opencode/ and how it was installed.
Let me check the package.json to understand how opencode is installed.
So opencode is installed via npm in `/root/.opencode/` with `@opencode-ai/plugin` at version `1.15.13`. Let me check what the `bin/opencode` file is.
It's a binary. This is a standalone install. Let me check the current version by running the opencode binary with --version, and then update it. The setup seems like opencode was installed with npm install in a local directory. Let me try updating it.
Current version: 1.15.13 Latest version: 1.17.6 The package name is `@opencode-ai/plugin`. Let me update it in the local `/root/.opencode/` directory.
The update completed. Let me verify the version and restart the server.
Hmm, the binary hasn't changed to 1.17.6. The binary file might not be updated by npm install (it could be a static binary that's included in the package). Let me check more carefully what happened. Actually wait - the `bin/opencode` is a binary file. It's possible npm install created a new bin but the old one is still cached. Or perhaps the update created a new version but the binary didn't get regenerated. Let me check if the node_modules has the updated version and check what the binary actually is.
The npm package `@opencode-ai/plugin` at version 1.17.6 doesn't contain a binary file in `dist/`. The `bin/opencode` must be downloaded separately. This is likely a standalone binary distribution. Let me check where the binary came from. Maybe I need to look at what package provides the `opencode` binary. Let me search for other npm packages that might be the main one.
It's a standalone ELF binary. Let me look at the `opencode-windows-arm64` package - that's described as a "placeholder package". There might be an `opencode` package that distributes the binary. Let me check if there's `@opencode-ai/cli` or similar.
`@opencode-ai/cli` at version 1.17.6 exists! Let me install that package instead, which likely contains the actual binary.
Alright, `@opencode-ai/cli` exists at version 1.17.6. Let me update the package.json to use this package instead of (or in addition to) `@opencode-ai/plugin`. Actually, looking at the current package.json, it only lists `@opencode-ai/plugin`. The binary in `bin/` is probably from the `@opencode-ai/cli` or `@opencode-ai/opencode` package. Let me check what `@opencode-ai/cli` provides in terms of binaries.
So `@opencode-ai/cli` provides a `lildax` binary, not `opencode`. And `@opencode-ai/plugin` is a library. The `opencode` binary in `/root/.opencode/bin/opencode` is a native ELF binary. It's a standalone binary downloaded from somewhere. Let me check if perhaps `@opencode-ai/opencode` (which returned nothing for `bin`) actually has the binary. Or maybe the binary was placed there manually. Wait, let me think about this differently. The binary is a native ELF binary (x86-64). The npm packages on the user's machine right now include `@opencode-ai/plugin`. But the binary in `bin/opencode` is a standalone binary. It's likely installed by a postinstall script from one of the packages. Let me check if the binary gets linked/symlinked from node_modules.
So `@opencode-ai/opencode` doesn't exist on npm. Let me check what the `@opencode-ai/plugin` package does - it might download the binary via postinstall script.
OK so `@opencode-ai/plugin` is just a library, it doesn't include the binary. Let me check where this binary came from. Let me look at the `@opencode-ai/sdk` package since it's a dependency.
Wait, this `@opencode-ai/sdk` doesn't seem to contain a binary either. The binary at `/root/.opencode/bin/opencode` was probably placed there originally by some installation script or directly downloaded. Looking more carefully at the scenario: The user originally installed opencode by running `npm install` in the `/root/.opencode/` directory with a specific package. The binary in `bin/opencode` is independent from the npm packages. The current binaries were installed when version 1.15.13 was installed. When I ran `npm install @opencode-ai/plugin@latest`, it updated the plugin and its dependencies but didn't update the binary because the binary comes from a different source. Let me check if there's another package that actually bundles the binary. Let me check the sdk more carefully.
The npm packages (`@opencode-ai/plugin` and `@opencode-ai/sdk`) are just JavaScript libraries - they don't contain the binary. The binary at `/root/.opencode/bin/opencode` is a standalone Go/ELF binary. This is a common installation method for opencode - you download a prebuilt binary from GitHub releases. The binary was probably placed there manually or via a script. Let me check GitHub for the latest release of opencode and download the latest binary. Let me download the latest binary from GitHub releases.
The `opencode-linux-x64.tar.gz` is the one we want for the standard x86-64 Linux binary. Let me download it and extract the binary.
There's already a file at `/tmp/opencode`. Let me extract to a subdirectory instead.
Now I need to: 1. Stop the current opencode server 2. Replace the binary 3. Restart the server Wait, but if I stop the server, I won't be able to communicate anymore. Let me check how it was started so I can restart it after replacing the binary. Actually, let me replace the binary and then signal the server to restart. Or I can just replace the binary and restart the process. Let me first check the running process details more carefully.
Now I need to: 1. Replace the binary 2. Send a signal to restart the process (SIGHUP or similar) Actually, the user is talking to me through this opencode server. If I replace the binary and restart, I might lose the connection. Let me ask the user first. Actually, they asked me to update it. Let me just do it - replace the binary and restart the process. The opencode process will restart and the conversation should reconnect. Let me copy the new binary over, then send a restart command to opencode.
The binary is currently running, so we can't overwrite it. We can rename it first and then place the new one, then restart.
The binary is now updated to 1.17.6. Now I need to restart the opencode server. The old binary is still running in memory. I need to kill it and start the new one. But if I kill the server, the conversation will end. Let me restart the process with the same arguments.